Free DUI Lawyer In California

Reader’s Question:

I know some people who have been arrested for DUI here in Alameda, California and some of them claim that they are innocent. How would a police officer claim that a driver is under the influence?

Hope

Alameda, CA

In a DUI investigation in Alameda, California, the police officer usually claims that the DUI suspect “performed poorly” or “failed” the field sobriety tests and the handheld breath test indicates that the driver’s blood alcohol level was above the legal limit. Based on this, the officer would “form an opinion” that the driver is under the influence or the driver’s ability to drive a motor vehicle safely is impaired. After this, the officer would arrest the driver and take him/her to the police station (or hospital) for a chemical test.

The driver suspected for DUI would choose between a breath test and a blood test. The state of California has an “Implied Consent Law” that says that a person who is arrested lawfully for DUI should submit to one of these tests. A refusal could subject the DUI suspect to stiffer court penalties and possibly a one-year (or longer) driver’s license suspension. If the driver chooses a blood test, the blood sample would be forwarded to a crime lab for analysis. If he/she chooses a breath test, the officer would see the blood alcohol content reading immediately after the driver blows twice into the breath test machine. The officer sometimes tells the DUI suspect of the result, sometimes not.

Reader’s Question:

I have heard several cases about DUI here in Whittier, California that makes me more curious about it. Question is, what are the possible DUI defenses that can be brought out in a DUI trial that are related to the DUI stop?

Kyla

Whittier, CA

In a DUI case in Whittier, California for example, the prosecution should prove that the person was driving a vehicle while intoxicated in order to be found guilty. You may think that this is very obvious, but this could be an issue that can be brought out in a DUI trial where the police officer arrives later at the scene of an accident or where a vehicle is parked and the driver is asleep.

Another defense that could be used in a DUI case is that the police officer didn’t have actual reason to stop the vehicle of the person who is suspected for DUI. The police officer simply has to have a probable cause to pull the driver over. Traffic violations such as unsafe lane change, expired license plate tags or speeding could provide the excuse the officer needs to pull a driver over. In other words, the officer should have a legal reason to stop the vehicle and suspect that the driver was intoxicated. Weaving within a lane is generally used for probable cause, but this by itself would not be sufficient evidence that the driver was indeed under the influence.

Reader’s Question:

After being caught drunk driving in Westminster, California, I know that my first concern would be the DMV hearing. What are the issues that are being raised in a DMV hearing that could help me save my license?

Chad

Westminster, CA

After your DUI charge in Westminster, California, the administrative driver’s license suspension began after the police officer took your license away and when you were given a pink piece of paper. The police officer would typically, but not always, check the box for the reason for taking your driver’s license. Usually the reason officer gives would be his belief that you were driving with a blood alcohol content (BAC) level of 0.08, you refused a blood alcohol test or there was a forced blood draw.

The very first issue that is being raised in a DMV hearing is if the officer had a reasonable cause to believe that you were driving a motor vehicle while having a BAC of 0.08% or more. Second is if the arrest or the detention lawful and if you refuse to take the blood alcohol test. It would be important to be realistic about your chances at winning at the DMV hearing because at this hearing, the DMV hearing officer is both a judge and prosecutor. Remember that if the police officer testifies at the DMV hearing, it would be an opportunity to question the officer without him/her being prepared by the prosecutor.

Reader’s Question:

I was told that after being arrested for DUI in Anaheim, California, I would also have a civil case. What is this civil case and what does it have to do with my arrest for DUI?

BJ

Anaheim, CA

Aside from the criminal court trial in your DUI case in California, there would also be a civil case. This would be the administrative law case and it would be heard before the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The administrative hearing has something to do with your driver’s license as this hearing before a DMV officer would determine whether you can keep your driving privileges or not. You should request for this hearing with the DMV within 10 days of the arrest.

You might be confused right now and you probably don’t understand that these are separate cases. It would be possible to win the administrative case with the DMV and loose the DUI criminal court case and on the other hand, it would also be possible to win the DUI criminal case and loose the administrative case with the DMV. But at times, the evidence collected for the administrative hearing could be used to get a reduction of charges in the criminal case.

Reader’s Question:

My teenage daughter has been charged with DUI here in California and this is actually already her second arrest. The first charges were actually dropped but we know that it’s not always gonna be the case. If she gets convicted, what are the possible penalties that she could have?

Izza

Anaheim, CA

The penalties for minors (under the age of 21) who are convicted for DUI are stiffer. The State of California strictly implements its zero tolerance law wherein a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.01% for a minor would get him/her arrested for DUI. Because of your daughter’s DUI in California, if she gets convicted, her driver’s license would be suspended for a period of one year and this would be before the court penalties would be imposed upon conviction, but she could get a temporary license for 30 days. She is entitled to request for a hearing at the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) to see if the evidence would confirm that her BAC has been at least 0.01% at the time of driving.

Since this would still be considered as her first DUI if she gets convicted, she would have a mandatory alcohol education that would be ordered by the court. If she gets enrolled with the program, she could apply for a restricted license that would allow her to drive to and from work and to and from her DUI program classes.

Reader’s Question:

Is it true that even if the person is not driving, but was found sleeping in the car and believed to have consumed alcohol, can be charged with DUI in California? How could this happen if the person was not actually driving?

Abby

Carson, CA

Yes, a person who is not really driving but has consumed alcohol and has slept in the car can be charged for DUI in Carson, California. If he/she is in control of a motor vehicle and in possession of the keys, it will be treated as drunk driving. In this case, it isn’t really ‘driving under the influence’ in its literal sense, but it’s gonna be ‘operating a motor vehicle under the influence.’ Even those who have slept in the back seat and may have potentially driven the car can be cited for DUI. But if the keys were not on the person at all, there may be ways to beat the DUI charge.

But in any DUI case, the court should find that there are reasonable grounds to believe for the police officer to believe that the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence. In finding out if a person has actual physical control over the vehicle, such that as person may be charged with DUI, the courts would look at where the person was seated in the vehicle and if the vehicle engine is running. In many DUI cases that the person was found sleeping behind the wheel and the engine was running, courts have upheld DUI convictions.

Reader’s Question:

Regardless of guilt, what legal rights does a person have during a DUI arrest? I wanna know these things just in case I get arrested for DUI in Alhambra, California.

Vito

Alhambra, CA

If you will be arrested for DUI in Alhambra, California, it would be of great help if you know the legal rights that you have during a DUI arrest. These rights are actually commonly ignored by police officers. First of all, there should be sufficient facts to legally constitute a probable cause to stop your vehicle. The officer should also have enough reasons to legally detain and arrest you for DUI.

You must be advised that submission to field sobriety tests and portable field breath test is not required by law. Furthermore, if you are already in custody or you have already been arrested, you should be advised of your constitutional rights, otherwise known as the “Miranda” warning before any further questioning takes place. You should also be given a choice of breath or blood testing and if you refuse any chemical test, you should be advised of the legal consequences and this would be the “implied consent” advisement. If a breath test is conducted at the police station, since the breath sample is not saved, you should be given a chance to obtain a blood sample for later independent testing by your DUI defense attorney.

Reader’s Question:

Field sobriety tests on DUI suspects are so popular that they sometimes show it on TV as bloopers. But seriously, why are these tests called divided attention tests and is there an incidence here in Antioch, California that a person who was really drunk has passed more than one of the field sobriety tests?

Cain

Antioch, CA

Field sobriety tests (FST’s) are categorized as standardized and non-standardized. Standardized FST’s are those commonly used by police officers in a DUI investigation and are approved by the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration. As we may all understand, standardized FST’s are psychophysical tests that require assessment of a DUI suspect’s appearance and condition, ability to follow instructions, as well as balance and coordination. These tests are often called Divided Attention Tests because they require the DUI suspect to concentrate on more than one thing at a time. He/she would have a divided attention between mental and physical tasks.

There may be an incidence already in Antioch, California that a person who was really drunk has passed more than one of the standardized FST’s but according to studies, a person who is under the influence of alcohol may perform one of the standardized FST’s but rarely more than one. If a person is under the influence of alcohol, he/she is likely to make certain predictable mistakes while attempting to do the FST’s.

Reader’s Question:

Is it true that having even just a glass of wine or a bottle of beer and then driving afterward can already have you arrested for DUI in California?

Mill

Concord, CA

It depends in if you are a minor and under what state you are in. In your case there in Concord, California the answer is yes, it is possible for you to be convicted of DUI even if you have consumed (in your opinion) a small amount of alcohol. It all depends on the result of the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) test and the level of suspicion of the police officer who have pulled you over. California has one of the strictest laws in the nation governing underage drinking, so anyone caught under 21 and has had a BAC result of 0.01% or greater will face a DUI charge. If you resulted with a 0.05% or greater then you can be arrested and be subjected to two charges, one for underage and a regular DUI charges as well.

To put things in perspective, for most people drinking a 12-ounce beer or one 4-ounce glass of wine or one 1.25-ounce of liquor will already tip your BAC result to over 0.01% to near 0.05%. If this happens to you, you are looking at a one year driver’s license suspension and any subsequent violations and convictions will lead to even more sever punishments, including fines up to the thousands and even jail time. Similarly, individuals who refuse to be tested will mean an automatic suspension of his or her license as well. In some cases, however, if you are 18 or over and have had no prior convictions, you may be able to just attend a 12-hour class regarding safety and alcohol or drug abuse.

Reader’s Question:

My son was arrested for DUI here in California and his case is proceeding to trial since he pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. What could we expect to go through during the DUI trial?

Cadence

Camarillo, CA

Just like any other criminal trial, California DUI trial has certain distinct elements. The first phase on your son’s DUI trial in Camarillo, California would typically be the submission of pre-trial motions. The next stage would be the jury selection, where 12 impartial jury members are chosen. During this stage, both sides engage in the examination of prospective jurors, to each individual’s suitability for jury service. After the jury has been selected, both sides would give opening statements which is an opportunity for your son’s DUI lawyer and the prosecutor to give a preview of what is to come in the DUI case.

After the opening statements, both sides would engage in the examination and cross examination of prosecution witnesses and experts and the examination and cross examination of defense witnesses and experts. Both sides would engage in closing arguments once all of the witnesses have testified. This is usually a chance to recap the DUI case that has been presented to the jury. The next stage of the DUI trial would be the jury deliberations and, finally, the verdict. Your son will be sentenced if he will be found guilty for the DUI charge. But it would be very important to keep in mind that defendants in DUI cases can prevail at trial.